| Gunji W, et al. (2004) Global analysis of the regulatory network structure of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Res 11(3):163-77 | 
        
                
            | Dos Santos SC, et al. (2009) Transcriptomic profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to quinine reveals a glucose limitation response attributable to drug-induced inhibition of glucose uptake. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(12):5213-23 | 
        
                
            | Zhao Y, et al. (2008) Development of a Novel Oligonucleotide Array-Based Transcription Factor Assay Platform for Genome-Wide Active Transcription Factor Profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 7(3):1315-1325 | 
        
                
            | Hanlon SE, et al. (2011) The Stress Response Factors Yap6, Cin5, Phd1, and Skn7 Direct Targeting of the Conserved Co-Repressor Tup1-Ssn6 in S. cerevisiae. PLoS One 6(4):e19060 | 
        
                
            | Zheng J, et al. (2010) Epistatic relationships reveal the functional organization of yeast transcription factors. Mol Syst Biol 6():420 | 
        
                
            | Jothi R, et al. (2009) Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture. Mol Syst Biol 5:294 | 
        
                
            | Gordan R, et al. (2011) Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights. Genome Biol 12(12):R125 | 
        
                
            | Babbitt GA (2010) Relaxed selection against accidental binding of transcription factors with conserved chromatin contexts. Gene 466(1-2):43-8 | 
        
                
            | Bussereau F, et al. (2006) The Kluyveromyces lactis repertoire of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Yeast Res 6(3):325-35 | 
        
                
            | Buck MJ and Lieb JD (2006) A chromatin-mediated mechanism for specification of conditional transcription factor targets. Nat Genet 38(12):1446-51 | 
        
                
            | Proft M and Serrano R (1999) Repressors and upstream repressing sequences of the stress-regulated ENA1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: bZIP protein Sko1p confers HOG-dependent osmotic regulation. Mol Cell Biol 19(1):537-46 | 
        
                
            | Beskow A and Wright AP (2006) Comparative analysis of regulatory transcription factors in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and budding yeasts. Yeast 23(13):929-35 | 
        
                
            | Ju S, et al. (2011) A Yeast Model of FUS/TLS-Dependent Cytotoxicity. PLoS Biol 9(4):e1001052 | 
        
                
            | Yu H and Gerstein M (2006) Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(40):14724-31 | 
        
                
            | Cardona F, et al. (2012) Phylogenetic origin and transcriptional regulation at the post-diauxic phase of SPI1, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Mol Biol Lett 17(3):393-407 | 
        
                
            | Ratnakumar S, et al. (2011) Phenomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal that autophagy plays a major role in desiccation tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biosyst 7(1):139-49 | 
        
                
            | Nehlin JO, et al. (1992) Yeast SKO1 gene encodes a bZIP protein that binds to the CRE motif and acts as a repressor of transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 20(20):5271-8 |