| Neely LA and Hoffman CS (2000) Protein kinase A and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways antagonistically regulate fission yeast fbp1 transcription by employing different modes of action at two upstream activation sites. Mol Cell Biol 20(17):6426-34 |
| Zheng J, et al. (2010) Epistatic relationships reveal the functional organization of yeast transcription factors. Mol Syst Biol 6():420 |
| Bohm S, et al. (1997) Variations of the C2H2 zinc finger motif in the yeast genome and classification of yeast zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 25(12):2464-9 |
| Zhang YQ and Rao R (2007) Global disruption of cell cycle progression and nutrient response by the antifungal agent amiodarone. J Biol Chem 282(52):37844-53 |
| Bussereau F, et al. (2004) Zinc finger transcriptional activators of yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 4(4-5):445-58 |
| Dalal CK, et al. (2014) Pulsatile dynamics in the yeast proteome. Curr Biol 24(18):2189-94 |
| Gordan R, et al. (2011) Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights. Genome Biol 12(12):R125 |
| Bussereau F, et al. (2006) The Kluyveromyces lactis repertoire of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Yeast Res 6(3):325-35 |
| Beskow A and Wright AP (2006) Comparative analysis of regulatory transcription factors in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and budding yeasts. Yeast 23(13):929-35 |
| Busti S, et al. (2010) Glucose signaling-mediated coordination of cell growth and cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sensors (Basel) 10(6):6195-240 |
| Platara M, et al. (2006) The Transcriptional Response of the Yeast Na+-ATPase ENA1 Gene to Alkaline Stress Involves Three Main Signaling Pathways. J Biol Chem 281(48):36632-42 |
| Dos Santos SC, et al. (2009) Transcriptomic profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to quinine reveals a glucose limitation response attributable to drug-induced inhibition of glucose uptake. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(12):5213-23 |
| Fendt SM, et al. (2010) Unraveling condition-dependent networks of transcription factors that control metabolic pathway activity in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 6():432 |
| Jothi R, et al. (2009) Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture. Mol Syst Biol 5:294 |
| Yu H and Gerstein M (2006) Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(40):14724-31 |
| Serra-Cardona A, et al. (2014) Coregulated Expression of the Na+/Phosphate Pho89 Transporter and Ena1 Na+-ATPase Allows Their Functional Coupling under High-pH Stress. Mol Cell Biol 34(24):4420-35 |
| Casamayor A, et al. (2012) The role of the Snf1 kinase in the adaptive response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to alkaline pH stress. Biochem J 444(1):39-49 |
| Luscombe NM, et al. (2004) Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 431(7006):308-12 |
| Gertz J and Cohen BA (2009) Environment-specific combinatorial cis-regulation in synthetic promoters. Mol Syst Biol 5:244 |
| Arino J (2010) Integrative Responses to High pH Stress in S. cerevisiae. OMICS 14(5):517-23 |
| Gelade R, et al. (2003) Multi-level response of the yeast genome to glucose. Genome Biol 4(11):233 |
| Hong KK and Nielsen J (2013) Adaptively evolved yeast mutants on galactose show trade-offs in carbon utilization on glucose. Metab Eng 16():78-86 |
| Zhou H and Winston F (2001) NRG1 is required for glucose repression of the SUC2 and GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genet 2():5 |
| Stagoj MN, et al. (2005) Fluorescence based assay of GAL system in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 244(1):105-10 |